When it comes to posts...well, in some days I had only one post, or none/ in other days maybe 3 or 4 posts; same goes for the reshares...too many reshares in a day/week compared to other days/weeks. Views number is also important, not sure why is not on this infographic. However these are just digits, I value quality rather than quantity.
Corina Marinescu the views are a bit difficult to work with. The source of the views is not really clear and it is a metric that is not really comparable between different accounts (chromecast-views, blogger-views, profile-views, post-views etc.). It would make sense in such an infographic where you check only your own numbers, but it could lead to strange discussions when comparing your year with the year of for e.g. Aravind Ravisankar Another reason to not have the views included is that Google decided to not show the view number in the "New Google+". Maybe they'll add it later, but it also possible that this number will be removed completely.
Thanks for sharing Corina Marinescu!
ReplyDeleteWow, more than 200 plusones in average per post! With more than 1k posts!
This is huge! But I know your posts, so that it is huge but no surprise ;)
Happy New Year!
Thank you.........
ReplyDeleteCongrats. You are doing an amazing thing. Don't stop.
ReplyDeleteWell, you do post a variety of interesting topics. I like your brain dumps
ReplyDeleteImpressive!
ReplyDeleteWhy is there some "peaks". The comments one makes sense since you allowed and unallowed comments. But what about the other ones?
ReplyDeleteWhen it comes to posts...well, in some days I had only one post, or none/ in other days maybe 3 or 4 posts; same goes for the reshares...too many reshares in a day/week compared to other days/weeks.
ReplyDeleteViews number is also important, not sure why is not on this infographic.
However these are just digits, I value quality rather than quantity.
Corina Marinescu the views are a bit difficult to work with. The source of the views is not really clear and it is a metric that is not really comparable between different accounts (chromecast-views, blogger-views, profile-views, post-views etc.).
ReplyDeleteIt would make sense in such an infographic where you check only your own numbers, but it could lead to strange discussions when comparing your year with the year of for e.g. Aravind Ravisankar
Another reason to not have the views included is that Google decided to not show the view number in the "New Google+". Maybe they'll add it later, but it also possible that this number will be removed completely.