Love is somehow more quantum-mechanical and electromagnetic than gravitational. Gravitation OTOH I feel more capable to model mass conventions -- best examples are languages and money/capital. The rise of the 1% and of the 1% of the 1% I find evocative of the ever higher concentration of mass in collapsing stars. Capital shows its analogy to mass by collapsing onto itself.
Until I see an equation that explains the twinkle in a woman's eyes, the feeling of making her smile and the joy in her laughter I think I'll reserve judgment on this & give Gravitation the benefit of the doubt ^_^
Neuron links collapsing into a black hole, too many, too fast
ReplyDeleteLove is somehow more quantum-mechanical and electromagnetic than gravitational. Gravitation OTOH I feel more capable to model mass conventions -- best examples are languages and money/capital. The rise of the 1% and of the 1% of the 1% I find evocative of the ever higher concentration of mass in collapsing stars. Capital shows its analogy to mass by collapsing onto itself.
ReplyDeleteUntil I see an equation that explains the twinkle in a woman's eyes, the feeling of making her smile and the joy in her laughter I think I'll reserve judgment on this & give Gravitation the benefit of the doubt ^_^
ReplyDeleteSounds legit Jerome Hall :)
ReplyDeleteLove is information-theoretic. I is more like a communication protocol that like a physical force.
ReplyDelete